Skip to Content

Elements of a Product Liability Claim

gavel next to mini-shopping cart

Defining Product Liability

Legal Basis for Claims

When it comes to product liability, understanding the legal grounds for filing a claim is crucial. There are three primary theories under which these claims can be pursued: strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Strict liability removes the burden of proving fault, meaning that a manufacturer can be held responsible for a defective product regardless of intent or negligence. Negligence, on the other hand, requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the manufacturer failed to exercise reasonable care in the product's design or manufacture. Breach of warranty involves a failure to fulfill the terms of a promise, claim, or representation made about the quality or type of product.

Types of Product Defects

Product defects fall into three main categories: design defects, manufacturing defects, and marketing defects, also known as failure to warn. Design defects are inherent; they exist before the product is made and imply that the product's design is inherently unsafe. Manufacturing defects occur during the construction or production of the item, deviating from the intended design. Marketing defects involve the failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions about the product's proper use, which could result in unforeseen dangers. Each type of defect requires a unique approach to prove in court, and understanding these distinctions is key to a successful product liability claim.

Establishing the Plaintiff's Burden of Proof

Proving a Defective Product

For plaintiffs, the cornerstone of a product liability case is establishing that a product is defective. This involves demonstrating that the product is inherently dangerous and that the danger is not obvious to the average user, leading to an unexpected injury. Plaintiffs must show that the product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect when used in the intended or a reasonably foreseeable manner. Gathering evidence such as product samples, photographs of the defect, and the product's history of similar issues can be instrumental in proving a product's inherent defectiveness.

Causation Link Between Product and Injury

Equally important to proving a product's defect is establishing causation—that the defect directly led to the injury. This means that the plaintiff must show a direct link between their use of the product and the harm suffered. This can be particularly challenging, as it often requires the exclusion of other potential causes of the injury. Detailed medical records, expert testimony, and a clear narrative that connects the product's defect to the injury are essential components in constructing a convincing causation argument.

Key Components of a Claim

Duty of Care and Breach

In product liability cases, manufacturers and distributors have a duty of care to produce and sell products that are safe for public use. A breach of this duty occurs when a product is released to the market with defects that the manufacturer should have known about and addressed. Plaintiffs must prove that the duty of care was breached by showing that the product was not as safe as it should have been and that this breach led to their injury. This often involves exploring industry standards, company protocols, and the product's safety record to show where and how the duty of care was not met.

Damages Sustained by the Plaintiff

Once a breach of duty is established, the focus shifts to the damages sustained by the plaintiff. In product liability claims, damages can be compensatory—intended to cover costs associated with the injury, such as medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering—or punitive, designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future negligence. The plaintiff must present a clear and detailed account of all damages to ensure full compensation. This often requires expert financial analysis and a comprehensive understanding of the long-term impacts of the injury.

Challenges in Product Liability Litigation

Common Defenses in Product Liability Cases

Defendants in product liability cases have a range of strategies at their disposal to counter claims. Common defenses include arguing that the plaintiff misused the product in a way that was unforeseeable, that the plaintiff assumed the risk by using the product despite knowing the dangers, or that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Each of these defenses requires the defendant to present evidence that shifts the responsibility away from the manufacturer and onto the plaintiff, complicating the litigation process and requiring plaintiffs to be thoroughly prepared to refute these claims.

Evidence and Expert Testimony

The role of evidence and expert testimony in a product liability case cannot be overstated. Collecting and presenting evidence that supports the claim of a defect and its link to the injury is a meticulous process that often involves sifting through technical data, internal company documents, and the product's safety history. Expert witnesses play a pivotal role in interpreting this evidence and providing credible, authoritative opinions on the nature of the defect, the expected behavior of the product, and the causation of the injury. Their testimony can make or break a case, as it helps translate complex information into understandable arguments that support the plaintiff's position.

Navigating the Legal Process

Steps in Filing a Product Liability Claim

Filing a product liability claim is a structured process that begins with the crucial step of hiring an experienced attorney. The attorney will help the plaintiff understand their rights and the intricacies of product liability law. Following this, a thorough investigation is conducted, evidence is gathered, and a detailed complaint is filed against the manufacturer or distributor. This complaint will lay out the legal basis for the claim, the alleged defects, the injuries sustained, and the damages sought. The legal process also involves pre-trial discovery, where both parties exchange information and build their cases.

The Role of Settlements and Trials

Many product liability cases are resolved through settlements, where the defendant offers compensation to the plaintiff in exchange for dropping the lawsuit. Settlements can provide a quicker resolution to a case without the uncertainty of a trial. However, if a settlement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to trial, where each side presents their evidence and arguments for a judge or jury to render a verdict. The decision to settle or go to trial depends on many factors, including the strength of the case, the potential damages, and the plaintiff's willingness to engage in a lengthy legal battle.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective product, Biren Law Group is here to help. Our experienced team understands the complexities of product liability law and is dedicated to fighting for the compensation you deserve. Don't navigate this challenging process alone—contact us today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in holding negligent manufacturers accountable.

Biren Law Group is available online or you can give us a call at (310) 896-4345.