Summary judgment denied in recent product liability lawsuit

Summary judgment denied in recent product liability lawsuit

In our post earlier this week, we told readers what “summary judgment” is and how it can affect the course of a civil lawsuit. Whenever big companies are named as defendants in lawsuits alleging product liability or other forms of personal injury, it is common for their attorneys to file a motion for summary judgment. It is in their interest to have the case thrown out before it can go to trial.

When considering one side’s motion, however, judges must typically view the evidence in the manner that is most favorable to the opposing side. If it is a close call, the judge will often deny the motion and have the case go to trial.

A good example of this idea is a federal products liability lawsuit against Fiskars Brands Inc. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is a man who alleges that he suffered serious and long-lasting pain and injuries when one of the company’s flashlights “spontaneously combusted” in his pocket in 2009.

At the time of the incident, the man was carrying a Gerber RZ700 flashlight in his front pants pocket. The flashlight had batteries in it but was turned off. The plaintiff alleges that the combustion sent “tiny glass shards in the air and a white or silver colored and chemical-smelling fumes and smoke around his face." He suffered a burn injury on his thigh and eye damage.

Defendant Fiskars filed a motion for summary judgment, essentially arguing that there was insufficient evidence and unreliable testimony to prove that the product malfunctioned because it was defective.

Thankfully, the judge denied the motion and the case will now go to trial. The judge wrote: “the evidence presented at this stage of the case is sufficient to give rise to a genuine issue of material fact as the question of whether the flashlight malfunctioned as a result of a manufacturing defect.”

If summary judgment had been granted to the defendant, the case essentially would have been dismissed. The judge’s decision doesn’t mean that the plaintiff has won his case. Rather, it means that the case now has the chance to go to trial and be heard by a jury.

Source: Courthouse News Service, “Pocket Flashlight Blast May Cost Manufacturer,” Philip A. janquart, Sept. 5, 2014


Free, No-Risk Consultation

We're ready to fight on your behalf. Request an appointment with our attorneys today.
    • Please enter your name.
    • Please enter your email address.
      This isn't a valid email address.
    • This isn't a valid phone number.
    • Please make a selection.
    • Please enter a message.